🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the seeming data breach could aid AI companies looking for material to train their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorised access found a third party scraped public metadata and used illicit methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, said the breached music would likely be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “create their own private free version of Spotify”. The executive added it could also enable tech companies to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Virtually every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.